The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
The line graph below compares the average proportions of energy production and the level of its consumption in the USA between the time period of 1950 and 2020 and projected consumption to 2025.
A glance at the figure reveals that, an overwhelming majority of energy were consumed by the United State of America than its production counterparts and the level of consumption will be increased over the period of time.
As a matter of fact, in 1950 the USA production of fossil fuel was 20 units and the production were more than doubled in next 25 years, with fluctuate in quantity in the first few years. After that there was a rapid fluctuation was noticed in terms of overall manufacturing of energy up to the present moment, though the average unit of fossil fuel were increased marginally and it is expected to continuing reaching up to 75 unit of energy production in 2025. Moreover, the USA consumed a little above energy than its production in its initial year and up to the present this trend showed an upward trend, with marginal fluctuation in average units in between the period and it is interesting to note that the consumption of fossil fuel in the USA is predicted to increased dramatically in last five years where it is expected to increase by 40 units at the end of the period in question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below compares the average proportions ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... consumption will be increased over the period of time. As a matter of fact, in 1950 the US...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72173913043 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76297762724 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473913043478 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 46.0 22.4926829268 205% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.1573889254 43.030603864 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 217.2 112.824112599 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 46.0 22.9334400587 201% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184829517409 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119783378848 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787983523448 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163025955025 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772916406587 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.8 13.2329268293 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.25 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 10.3012195122 195% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.4 10.9970731707 186% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.