The given line graph compares and contrasts the data on the changes in the total quantities of American consumption and production in terms of energy over a 50 - year period between 1950 and 2000 and gives predictions until 2025. The most striking feature from the graph is that although both figures for consumption and production have been experiencing an upward trend, the amount of consumed energy of the US's people was estimated higher value than that produced.
In the first period from1950 to 1975, the US consumption and production started at around 30 quadrillions of BTU and then they steadily climbed to about 65 units in 1975 after some fluctuations around 40 and 35 units, respectively. As a result, although the figure for consumption was consistently higher, the difference between them was marginal.
However, the next 25 years witnessed a significant increase regarding this gap because the demand for energy grew to exceed production, so energy imports needed to bridge it. In detail, the amount of energy consumed went up to roughly 90 units, whereas that produced rose to only nearly 70 units.
Estimates up to 2025 demonstrate that this trend is likely to continue, with a more high-distance gap between them. To specify, by 2025, it is forecast that the consumption of energy will reach 140 units, while the production will hit only 90 units.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, then, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04867256637 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81124237668 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7077121907 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.625 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233266834471 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929182344867 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626067610086 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130684386283 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082383944236 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.