The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.

Essay topics:

The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web.

A breakdown of changes in the rates of wheat exports in Australia, Canada, and European community is depicted in the line chart. Overall, all figures stood at the similar number, but the three areas showed a different trend in the end of the period.

Initially, all graph started at between 15 and 20 millions of tonnes of wheat. From 1986 to 1988, Canada experienced a significant increase and peaked at 25 millions tonnes in 1988. Similarly, European community rose slightly to 15 millions tonnes ,while Australia decrease gradually to around 12 millions tones.

It is clear that in the two following years, the wheat export in canada suffered a significant plunge to nearly 15 millions tonnes an recovered by around 5 millions tonnes in the end of the year. Furthermore, Europe enjoyed a gradual improvement, with over 20 millions tonnes of wheat and Australia remained constant to around 11 millions tonnes in the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustralia, Canada, and European community is depicted in the line chart. Overall, ...
^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...ly, all graph started at between 15 and 20 millions of tonnes of wheat. From 1986 to 1988, Can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nity rose slightly to 15 millions tonnes ,while Australia decrease gradually to ar...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ant plunge to nearly 15 millions tonnes an recovered by around 5 millions tonnes i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, similarly, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01910828025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75852806002 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3925671977 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0316956137096 0.215688989381 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0183573334696 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217231738113 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0242230657004 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00587619171002 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.