The graph below gives the information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant.
The graph shows the information regarding on different form of energy that USA consumed since 1980 with projections until 2030. Over 6 type of energy, petrol and oil was known to be the most energy that consumed by USA.
In the beginning of 1980, petrol and oil had 35 quadrillion units of energy consumption and seemed to have fluctuated units number of consumption until 1995. The units started to increase and predicted to reach the highest units in 2030 with approximately 50 quadrillion units. The second most consumed energy was coal and followed with natural gas. Both of the energy was a bit in a competition since 1980 (around 15 and 20 units respectively), and in the late 2010, coal rose to nearly 30 quadrillion units within 20 years while natural gas remain stably with the same number of units.
For the remaining energy, there was nuclear, solar/wind, and hydropower. These three had the same units, which is just less than 5 quadrillion units in 1980. Nuclear kept increasing and the units became doubled in 2030. While solar/wind and hydropower also experienced fluctuations, however, resulting hydropower as the least consumed energy in USA.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also experienced fluctuations, however, resulting hydropower as the least consum...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0310880829 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76729537683 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569948186528 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7856405 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17951977503 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804901526731 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950088492955 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143645292669 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890522853363 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.