The line graph illustrates the USA’s usage of six sources of power in the 15 years period.
Overall, it can be seen that petrol and oil has stayed consecutively at the dominant role. Beside, the gap between the highest and lowest number - hydropower remains stable during the research.
Regarding petrol and oil, coal and gas, these sectors all have an upward trend. Petrol and oil’s growth is the most remarkable: Starting from 35 quadrillions in 1980, it is predicted to reach the peak at nearly 50 quadrillions in 2030. Coal is an inverse proportion to natural gas. Beginning from 20 quadrillions in the first year, it’s witnessed a slight turbulence until 2015 and seems to be constant around 23 for the next years. Coal had a more significant increase to join natural gas in 2015 and overcome its position to become the second-highest number at 25 quadrillions in 2030.
Concerning the other three, there is a presence of a small fluctuation. All of these factor shared the same starting point at 4 quadrillions. While Hydropower remains its stability relatively, nuclear and solar/wind enhace steadily around five quadrillion. In 2030, the gap between them are predicted to be widened more than before although Hydropower will continuously stay at the bottom of the graph.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07075471698 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91501285048 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646226415094 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6488593122 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5833333333 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0587171892779 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0193726421789 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249365506615 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0345705012305 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234627656811 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.