The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The line graph illustrates the amount of fuel used by the US in the 1980-2008 period as well as predicted figures until 2030.
The first impression is that Petrol and Oil witnessed the highest quadrillion units in the six fuel types. In contrast, Nuclear, Solar/Wind, and Hydropower were seen at the lower end of the consumption level. Overall, there was an increasing trend observed all over the graph.
In particular, before achieving steady growth since 1995, the amount of Petrol and Oil consumption fluctuated for 15 years, starting at 35 quadrillion units. While the general numbers in Coal and Natural Gas were pretty similar compared to others, their changes in some given years were opposite. For example, Natural Gas suffered a rather big drop in 1980-1985 when Coal saw a subtle improvement while in 2015-2030, coal is expected to rise dramatically which is different from the staying-still tendency in Natural Gas.
On the other hand, compared with Solar/Wind and Hydropower, the consumption level of Nuclear rose consistently and is projected to stay like that until 2030. This tendency in future years is shared by the Solar/Wind and Hydropower but during past years, these two energies went through ups and downs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in contrast, in particular, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26344086022 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78401715727 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3253246753 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2222222222 5.23603664747 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111827959958 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459579358964 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432836701725 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744543365844 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343722398094 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.