The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of enery in the USA since 1980 with the projection until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the data of energy consumption reported in the United State from 1980 to 2008 and the predictable period to 2030.
Overall, uses of petrol, coal, and natural gas have increased significantly while there are few changes in consumption of nuclear power, solar/wind energy, and hydropower.
Regarding the picture, in the 1980s, petrol and oil took up the largest with 35 quadrillion units, which is over double that coal, 16 quadrillion units. At the same time, the number of units of natural gas was 20 quadrillions, and one-fifth belonged to nuclear power, wind/solar energy, and hydropower.
In 1995, petrol and oil were still the largest ones after fluctuating time and kept increasing until 2008, then it will continuously rise dramatically to reach 50 quadrillion units in 2030. The changes of natural gas were the same as petrol, but it will remain plateau from 2015 to 2030 for 23 quadrillions, while we witnessed the stably increase of coal expenditure, which will be double than the beginning, 32 quadrillion units.
However, the consumption of nuclear power and solar/wind energy will have been rising but it still takes a small amount to 7 and 6 quadrillion units respectively. The one that will drop after several times of fluctuating is hydropower, which will consume 3 quadrillion units in the end.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13698630137 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94250345063 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570776255708 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.6442788599 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.625 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852891269401 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484492996675 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720965288829 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680836911271 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842233907194 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.