The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The line graph illustrates the usage of six types of energy source by the United States from the year of 1980 with the future projection till 2030. Data is given in the unit of Quadrillion units.
Overall, it is clear that Petrol and Oil remained as the most consumed energy over the years, while the least used power sources were from the natural resources. Moreover, it is predicted that most of the energy consumption will continue to rise until 2030.
The historical trends showed the most consumed energy Petrol and Oil, increased from 35 units to 40 units between 1980 and 2015, and such increase is expected to continue with a greater scale, reaching almost 50 units by 2030. Starting some 20 units, the usage of Coal and Natural Gas were practically identical in 1980. Followed by some fluctuation until 2015, while the figure of Coal is expected to be have a double rise by 2030, it is projected that Natural Gas consumption will remain constant at 22 units by the end of the period.
Meanwhile, in stark contrast to the high consumption of Petrol and Oil, the figures for nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower were persistently low, with less than 10 units over the whole period. Slight rises are expected for the former two types, whereas a gentle decline is anticipated for the application of hydropower, whereby standing at some 7% and 2% respectively by 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t at 22 units by the end of the period. Meanwhile, in stark contrast to the high...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83050847458 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57780395973 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555084745763 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5982252813 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211470873721 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924947111055 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769558747087 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13957247989 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543960432751 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.