The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

The graph provides information about the USA's employment patterns between 1930 and 2010.
There are two basic general trends, downward and upward. Regarding the former, the employment in Farming, fishing and Foresting fell dramatically from more than 70 per cent to almost about 5 in 2010. It experienced a gradual decrease over the first four decades, followed by a significant drop by the end of the period.
In contrast, employment rate in the other spheres went up by varying degrees. The employment pattern in both industrial and technical rocketed significantly. Concerning the first, it remained unchanged over 40 years, followed by a sudden rise in 1970. It continued to rise, levelling off in the last ten years and going up from zero percent to higher than 30 percent. Furthermore, the trend in technical also surged, rising from zero to about 30 per cent. Lastly, the trend in sales and office experienced fluctuations throughout the whole period, however, it was still upward.
It is clear that only the employment pattern in farming, fishing and foresting subsided with time, while it increased for the rest.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, regarding, so, still, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15846994536 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81350195407 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633879781421 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2517898883 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.8181818182 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123760797327 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546228625226 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103262207544 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124064683399 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141003532134 0.0819641961636 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.