The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over the period of 15 years

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by 3 companies over the period of 15 years.

The line graph compares the waste production (in tonnes) by 4 different companies (A, B and C) from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, the amount of waste produced by company A and B showed a downward trend, while there was an increase in the figure for company C. It is noticeable that company B experienced the most significant change during the period shown.
As can be seen from the graph, in the year 2000, the production of waste of company A was highest, at 12 tonnes. The figure for B and C were lower, about 9 tonnes and around 5 tonnes, respectively. Ten years later, the amount of waste produced by company B declined to roughly 7 tonnes after a sharp growth by 2 tonnes over the first five years. During the same period, the figure for company A decreased, compared to a rise was seen in the waste production of company C.
By 2015, C became the company producing the highest amount of waste, nearly 11 tonnes. Meanwhile, the figure for B was down to 3 tonnes, which is significantly lower than that of A, at approximately 8 tonnes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46560846561 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6986409282 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7227435144 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350220950216 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150803872739 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943840107179 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213617407404 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900031362739 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.