The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph indicates the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions which are discharged by a person in four specific nations, including the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal over the 40-year period, from 1967 to 2007. The statistic is given by tonnes.
In a general perspective, it is apparent that Italy and Portugal had witnessed an increasing trend through 40 years, while the inhabitants in Sweden and the United Kingdom cut down their CO2 release.
Initially, in 1967, the United Kingdom was the country that produced the largest amount of CO2, around 11, at the same time, Portugal had the lowest point, approximately 1.5. In the next 10 years, Sweden saw a sharp growth to hit its peak, from over 8 to more than 10, Italy and Portugal experienced a similar trend, their data both rose but not as significant as Sweden's, from 4 and 1.5 to 6 and 2, respectively. The United Kingdom was the sole nation that decreased the emissions created by a person in this period.
From 1987 to 2007, Italy and Portugal's statistics had the same tendency to move upwards then remain stably, from 3 and 5, went up to nearly 7 and 6, correspondingly. Meanwhile, Sweden and the United Kingdom residents reduce their CO2 discharges, while Sweden witnessed a considerable drop, from its peak at 8 to meet the same data with Portugal at 6, the United Kingdom fell gradually, from 11 to 9.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71487671093 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5875 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.755476209 43.030603864 257% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.285714286 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269823572116 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13237765178 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953462380997 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18438275201 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685495035033 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.