The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph depicts the changing trends in average emissions of carbon dioxide in four countries over a period of 40 years from 1967 to 2007. Despite varying increasing and decreasing trends, total average emissions reduced by 2007. The United Kingdom and Sweden experienced decreasing trends, while Italy and Portugal recorded mostly increasing trends.
In 1967, UK's emissions were at about 11 metric tonnes and after experiencing a steady decline, ended at about 8.5 metric tonnes in 2007, while remaining the highest emitter of CO2. Sweden, the second highest emitter in 1967, started at about 8.5 metric tonnes, experienced a dramatic rise in emissions, and peaked in 1977 at about 10.5 metric tonnes, after which emissions rapidly dropped to about 5 metric tonnes by 2007.
Italy started out as the third highest carbon emitter, at about 4.5 metric tonnes, and after a steady increase in emissions, had attained the same level of emissions as Sweden by 1987. It overtook Sweden to become the second highest emitter by 2007 and narrowed the gap with the UK.
On the other hand, Portugal, despite its upward trend, maintained its relatively low emissions among the four countries. It started out at 1.5 metric tonnes in 1967 and by 2007 had tripled to about 4.5 metric tonnes, very nearly the same level as Sweden's emissions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...among the four countries. It started out at 1.5 metric tonnes in 1967 and by 2007...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1095890411 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45836878296 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4160465469 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144701744718 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765936915995 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405262070935 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102108659934 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609173455345 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.