The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There are given information about average carbon dioxide emissions per person in four European countries over a 40-year period between 1967 and 2007 by line graph.
Overall, what stands out from this graph,there are in United Kingdom and Sweden were downward trend, while in Italy and Portugal illustrated upward trend.
By 1967, in United Kingdom was the highest amount of carbon dioxide emissions at nearly 11 metric tonnes per person. Then, there was a decrease until the end of period and it remained at 9 metric tonnes in 2007. In addition, in Sweden started with just under 9 metric tonnes in 1967, following this increased considerably by 2 metric tonnes in 1967. After this, there was a dramatic drop by approximately 3 tonnes in 1987. Eventually, declined gradually until 2007 at just below 6 metric tonnes.
At this period, Italy and Portugal had nearly similar trend. They begun at just over 4 and 1 metric tonnes per person respectively. Simultaneously, there were gradual rise until the end of period which were at just under 8 and 6 metric tonnes respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...Overall, what stands out from this graph,there are in United Kingdom and Sweden were d...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'began'?
Suggestion: began
...Portugal had nearly similar trend. They begun at just over 4 and 1 metric tonnes per ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98888888889 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68291347072 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7849130221 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226459051665 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988989784762 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963729452061 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161180291002 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893339538722 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.