The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line chart compares the numbers of the UK traveling daily by 3 various means of transports from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, while the number of people who travel by car and train followed an upward trend, the opposite was true for the other. Also, the car was always the most popular mode of transport over the period shown.
In 1970, about 5 million UK commuters traveled on a daily basis by car, while the number of bus and train users were 4 million and 2 million respectively. After remaining almost unchanged in the next 10 years, the total of travelers in all 3 means of transport showed some fluctuation. To be specific, the number of train users rose slightly by 1 million people in 2000. Likewise, there was a dramatic increase to 7 million in the sum of people who use cars. Whereas, the period from 1980 to 2000 witnessed a steady decrease in the number of UK commuters traveling each day by bus.
From 2000 onwards, the number of car and train users both stayed constant. Then, from 2010 to 2020 the sum of car and train travelers experienced an increase of about 1 million. During the same period, the number of bus passengers still showed an upward trend.
In the next ten years, it is predicted that the number of people who drive to work will hit the highest point with 9 million and the number of train passengers witnessed a sharp rise. While the number of train commuters is forecast to decrease gradually to nearly 3 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lion in the sum of people who use cars. Whereas, the period from 1980 to 2000 witnessed...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rain passengers witnessed a sharp rise. While the number of train commuters is foreca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, still, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58620689655 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45346585927 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501915708812 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.141023002 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0769230769 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246563826608 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100449849729 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594349138503 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147781136955 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435288875475 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.