The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the number of travelers using public transport such as car, bus, and train in the UK from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, the car is the most popular means of transport. Meanwhile, the train is predicted to replace the bus as the second most prevalent transportation.
In 1970, there were about 5 million people traveled by car. This was followed by bus with the figure of around 4 million commuters while the figure for the train was only 2 million individuals. After 40 years, the number of UK citizens using cars increased considerably, from 5 million to approximately 7 million, whereas the number of passengers using trains slightly rose to about 1 million. In contrast, the figure for bus users gradually decreased by 500,000 people.
It is predicted that in 2030, the number of people traveling by car will reach its peak with 9 million voyagers. Surprisingly, the bus will be replaced by train as the figure for it will drop to 3 million while the number of the replacement will be about 5 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gradually decreased by 500,000 people. It is predicted that in 2030, the number...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76404494382 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78746812324 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8431547932 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192497554029 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965280188449 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062444307919 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140023645066 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652566494614 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.