the graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by bus, car or train between 1970 and 2030
The line graph above shows the number of commuters using three types of transportation: bus, car, and train each day for 60 years from the 1970s to the 2030s.
At first sight, there are significant changes in traveling by bus, car, and train over 60 years. The increasing number of people using the car and train illustrated by two lines blue and yellow respectively, that is almost parallel, in contrast to the green line for the bus has dropped.
In the year 1970, 2 million people used a train, twice of those used a bus while 5 million people traveled by car. In the following ten years, there was no change considerably. Over 20 years from 1980 to 2000, the number of commuters using the car and train rose slightly to 7 million and 3 million respectively. In the next period from 2000 to 2010, the trend tended to remain stable but in the next decade, it increased steadily again and they predict it will reach 9 million for using a car and 5 million for using a train in the 2030s. However, the number of people traveling by bus decreased steadily over a period for 50 years and they expect it will drop to nearly 3 million in 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph above shows the number of commuters usi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4619047619 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4737900453 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519047619048 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9712926111 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276049819943 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13647215284 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909979019925 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227693343302 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728887078758 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.