The graph below shows changes in the popularity of cinema and television (1957-1975). Write a report on this topic
A glance at the given line diagram illustrates the fluctuation of the number of cinema and television from 1957 to 1975.
It is apparent from the graph that the trend used to demonstrate the cinema admissions have slumped for 18 years. In the meanwhile, by stark contrast, TV licenses appeared to soar continually over the time period.
Considering the volume of cinema in 1957, it mirrored the high utilization accomplishing somewhere in the vicinity of 950. To be more specific, it was attributed to higher than TV quantities at the initial point. On the one hand, it would be obvious in 1960, the cinema turn-over had to get a bad slump with exactly 500, as same as the number of TV licenses at that time. Afterward, the dwellers participating in cinemas were likely to gradually decrease. To be more specific, it gained some 250 in 1966, 200 in 1969 and it was no more than 100 at the end of the process.
Indicated in TV the appearance of TV trend, after 1960, it still started to fly. Clearly, in 1966, it showed by 770 which was worse than 1972 with nearly 900. Finally, it jumped by 930 in 1975. So comparing the distinguishes between cinema admission and TV licenses, it was easily seen that at the beginning, the number of people utilizing TV was lower than cinema, but in the end, the distinction occurred.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6452991453 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75584039693 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0338206789 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5833333333 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126369998335 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513442533003 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516084819108 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093919901622 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520412654993 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.