The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph compares the consumption of four different types of food in a European nation over a 26 years period from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear from the line graph that the amount of fish consumed was by far lowest during the research period. Additionally, while the quantities of Beef, Lamb, and Fish both fell, there was a significant rise in the figure for chicken.
In 1979, the consumption of Beef was highest, at more than 200 grams, while the amount of fish was dramatically lower, at roughly 60 grams. Meanwhile, about 150 grams of Lamb were eaten by people in a European nation. It was higher than the amount of chicken consumed, at below 150 grams. In 1989, the consumption of chicken increased to approximately 200 grams, whereas the other figures gradually went down.
In 2004, the quantity of Chicken eaten rose significantly to around 200 grams and became the highest figure compared to other food. By contrast, the consumptions of Beef and Lamb slightly declined to 120 grams and 60 grams, respectively. At the same time, the consumption of Fish remained steady, at approximately 50 grams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86315789474 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77006155116 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4955314901 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186198517897 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768874188197 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629039151158 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132860790728 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713638452183 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.