The given graph illustrates the fish and meat (chicken, beef,lamb and fish) consumption in one European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, chicken experienced upward trend and beef and lamb showed downward trend over the period given. While, fish remained almost constant all year around.
In 1979, people consumed around 220 grams beef per person per week, being highest portion of the chart. At first it dropped to 175 grams and then increased to peak at approximately 245 grams. After that, it continued to fall in the following periods and finally reached to just above 100 grams per person per week. Lamb had the same trend that started from 150 grams per person per week and reduced significantly throughout the year, hitting low point of about 60 grams per person per week.
However, Consumption of chicken was below 150 grams per person per week at the beginning of the period and then it showed a dramatic growth over the period, reaching to nearly 250 grams in 2004. Whereas, fish was the lowest portion of the graph that people consumed only about 55 grams per person per week in 1979. Initially, it witnessed slight decline to below 50 grams and remained about same throughout the year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , lamb
...ustrates the fish and meat chicken, beef,lamb and fish consumption in one European co...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d downward trend over the period given. While, fish remained almost constant all year...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the highest'.
Suggestion: being the highest
...und 220 grams beef per person per week, being highest portion of the chart. At first it dropp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., reaching to nearly 250 grams in 2004. Whereas, fish was the lowest portion of the gra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89268292683 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33359450112 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7742182384 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.3 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120001392912 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630259791752 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732336372177 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111917988178 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924086387326 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.