The line graph compares the proportion of expenditure on four different types of meat in a country in Europe from 1979 and 2004.
It's clear that at the beginning of the period Beef was the most popular option in this country, while it was over taken by chicken to be the priority in 1987. Fish was in the minority among these four choices all the time.
In the year 1979, people took around 220 grams of beef, while the figures seen from the graph had been fluctuated sharply in the following 8 years, and had experienced a deeply fall since 1986 to around 100 grams weekly by the year of 2002. While, Chicken was merely the third option slightly behind lamb in 1979, with less than 150 grams every week. And the data of chicken rose nearly all the time to a peak over the covered years, reaching approximately 250 grams by the end of 2002.
Lamb's pattern generally saw a big drop between 1979 to 2004, dropped from 150 grams to around 60 grams, even if there were some minor increases during the whole time. The given number of fish was comparative sable and basically remained about 50 grams per week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('deeply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
... following 8 years, and had experienced a deeply fall since 1986 to around 100 grams weekly b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5198019802 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17319966515 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623762376238 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1047340578 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111627913874 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531482495201 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536052625768 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845091908565 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059468151731 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.