The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph depicts the intake of fish, lamb, beef and chicken by individual European people in grams from the year 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that consumption of fish, lamb and beef are decreasing by the time. Whereas, in case of chicken it is increasing and interestingly it becomes the most consumed food by Europeans.
Initially, In the year 1979 lamb and chicken shares almost equal proportion of uptake (149 grams). However by the time intake of lamb is getting decreased as compared to consumption of chicken which was 200 grams per single where former one was half then intake of latter in the year 1990. Lastly, chicken was noted the most preferred food by the residents of Europe for the year 2004.
Secondly, in the year 1979 beef was the most eaten food amongst the other categories at 220 grams per individual, moreover, it increased after two years even 30 grams more than before. However, by the time intake of beef started decreasing, even though it was the second most eaten food in the year 2004. Interestingly fish was the least food taken by the Europeans, although it was fluctuating throughout the time, it remains the lowest in the year 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of lamb is getting decreased as compared to consumption of chicken which was 200 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76699029126 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53886743747 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0082882603 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110421459873 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591455428677 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566126512136 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940003105704 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062888338593 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.