The graph gives information about how much gram fish, lamb, beef and chicken was eaten by European people in one week from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, beef was the food which was consume most at the beginning while the chicken was the first at the end of the period. Despite of this, the least eaten was fish in the whole time.
To begin with, beef had many fluctations and people were prefer to eat beef more than anything between 1979 and 1989. After that, they chose the chicken mostly until 2004 and preferance of beef was decreased slightly almost 100 grams per person although it was reached just under the 250 grams in the years between 1980 and 1984. Chicken was passed to 250 grams before 2004 in despite of people ate just under 150 grams per week in 1979.
There was gradually decline for lamb consumption of people because it was approximately 150 grams in 1979 and it fell into a little over to 50 grams. Additionally, consumption of fish remained constant in the 25 years period. People consume approximately 50 grams from 1979 to 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
... Overall, beef was the food which was consume most at the beginning while the chicken...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6577540107 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29561921865 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0289763808 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110650847426 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602111469473 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419439353244 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846093216972 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523200065865 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.