The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the proportion of three sectors( agriculture, manufacturing, business and financial services) to the UK economy in the twentieth century.
Overall, it can be see that the agriculture contributed the most from 1900 to 1950 while business and financial contributed the least. however, the business and financial overcame agriculture to contributed the most in 2000.
In term of agriculture, it make a contribution of approximately 50% in 1900 and slightly increased to more than 50% in 1950. however, it rapidly decreased to only well under 10% in 2000.
In the other hand, the business and financial has an exponentially rose from considerably under 10% to more than 30% in the period given. The manufacturing shows a gradually declined from just under 50% in 1900 to more than 10% in 2000
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ss and financial contributed the least. however, the business and financial overcame ag...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... in 2000. In term of agriculture, it make a contribution of approximately 50% in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...tly increased to more than 50% in 1950. however, it rapidly decreased to only well unde...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('exponentially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rose') instead of another adjective.
...er hand, the business and financial has an exponentially rose from considerably under 10% to more tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...der 50% in 1900 to more than 10% in 2000
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 688.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21212121212 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21044124164 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7079727732 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25506939285 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128247888806 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144205337953 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183768768834 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167692498335 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.