The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.
The given bar chart illustrates three method of disposal of waste materials in 2005, 2006 and 2008. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, landfill method of disposal was the most used in 2005. In 2008, landfill method was dominated by dumping in sea. Burning of waste was the least popular among given years.
In 2005, landfill method was used for almost double amount (2000 million tonnes) of disposal than burning and dumping in sea, which were accounts for 900 million tonnes and 1200 million tonnes respectively.
In the following year, again the most popular method of disposal was landfill, but the amount disposed was lesser than that in 2005, which made up 1600 million tonnes. Just under 1200 million tonnes was disposed off by burning method and a little over 1400 million tonnes was dumped in sea.
Dumping in sea method for disposal was took place of landfill in 2008, constituted just over the 1600 million tonnes while landfill method gradually went down to almost three-fourth of dumping in sea and burning of waste materials was used approximately 900 million tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...5, 2006 and 2008. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, landfill method of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 40, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
... Dumping in sea method for disposal was took place of landfill in 2008, constituted ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06593406593 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34393311787 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445054945055 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4209585437 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124083695817 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078603007314 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580068771697 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100875140507 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457517477143 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.