The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrate analyses that number of books read by men and women between 2011 and 2014 at the Burnaby Public Library.
In 2011, men read 2000 book less than women. Number of books read by men increase year by year without dropping. Most significant rise in 2013. Only 4000 book read by male and next year boomed to nearly 10000. Last year of graph climb to 14000.
Women read more than men until 2013. In 2014, there is dramatically fall in number of books read by female to 7000. Initially 5000 books read by women at 2011. Then rise to approximately 8000 at 2012. In 2013, 9000 books read by female also men read as same as women.
To sum up, men’s book interesting rise annually. Except last two years women read more than men. There are surprisingly fall in number of books read by women at 2014. Male reader increase while female readers decrease among last year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'book' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'books'.
Suggestion: books
...ost significant rise in 2013. Only 4000 book read by male and next year boomed to ne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omen at 2011. Then rise to approximately 8000 at 2012. In 2013, 9000 books read b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5786163522 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18287019166 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534591194969 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.069941964 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 48.5333333333 112.824112599 43% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.6 22.9334400587 46% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331515799473 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143432476412 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110156341518 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265356785112 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894002940832 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.4 13.2329268293 41% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.71 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.7 10.3012195122 36% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.1 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.