The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
The line chart provides information about the total number of books read by females and males at Burnaby public library between 2011 and 2014. The data is in the number of books per year.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line graph that the number of books read by both men and women increased in the given period. Meanwhile, males overtook women in this category, whereas the rate for women; declined in the following time.
To embarks with there were over 2000 books; read by men in 2011, which were two times lower than women, while women at 4500 books in the same year. Moreover, in 2012, women and men both showed an upward trend. Until 2013, both at the same position at 8500 books.
However, the rate of men in terms of reading books rose over to 13,000 books, which was nearly double than women in 2014, which were at 6000 books because women started a downward trend after 2013 at Burbaby public library.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60479041916 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.93869615841 2.65546596893 73% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.806139633 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49383996452 0.215688989381 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196550080718 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976888115705 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285330996046 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589002185636 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.