The number of car production in three different nations, which are Argentina, Australia, and Thailand is illustrated by the given table from 2003 to 2009. It is conventionally observed that considerable changes have been seen in the car outcomes over the given time period.
To start with, it can be seen that, in 2003, over 787,000 cars were produced in Thais and this proportion was sharply rose to more than 11 lakh in 2006. Similarly, in Argentinean, manufactured the least number of the vehicle that is 166,000 among the three countries in the year 2003. However, the figures were the second-largest countries in 2006 and 2009, with 420,000 and 510,000 automobiles being manufactured respectively. While, in 2009, Thais motorcars outcomes were considerably decreased from 2006 to 2009, with 999 thousand.
Secondly, the Australian motorcars growth was enormously decreased. it was the second-largest in all the nations in the car outputs that is around 538,000. Furthermore, the numbers were the lowest in 2006 and 2009, with 345,000 and 225,000 automobiles being produced respectively.
Overall, it is usually clear that Thailand had the highest number of vehicles, it typically accounted for six years. Also, in all the countries apart from Australia, a significant increase is observed over the given time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...n Thais and this proportion was sharply rose to more than 11 lakh in 2006. Similarly...
^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'lakh' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'lakhs'.
Suggestion: lakhs
...ortion was sharply rose to more than 11 lakh in 2006. Similarly, in Argentinean, man...
^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cond-largest countries in 2006 and 2009, with 420,000 and 510,000 automobiles bei...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'motorcars'' or 'motorcar's'?
Suggestion: motorcars'; motorcar's
...9 thousand. Secondly, the Australian motorcars growth was enormously decreased. it was...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...orcars growth was enormously decreased. it was the second-largest in all the natio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, apart from, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35885167464 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0236584585 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2802474096 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.818181818 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201377771884 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791090640213 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525459775728 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117841906041 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497924164845 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.