The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph details the number of questionnaires received by the Tourist Information Center in a particular city in terms of a six-month period during 2011.
Looking from all perspectives, it is readily apparent that the trends for two in three of the data show an upward trend throughout the period, while there is one with a declining pattern. Turning to the details, more people tend to ring the office rather than to send emails or to contact in person during the first three months of the survey period. Then, the number of people asking in person exceeds that of the phone call after March, in which there is a gradual increase till June with more than 1800 people.
Meanwhile, the trend for the individuals sending emails shows a steady decrease between January and March, which later faces a sharp dip in May, from 700 to less than 400 in number. Regarding phone calls, the graph has minor fluctuations from January to March and leveled off for one month. However, the later three months showed moderate growth in the number of people, in addition of 600 individuals in June to the existing 1000.
To sum up, the lowest trend in January which is contacting in person stands at the top of the chart in June, while the ringing option reaches second place followed by inquiring through letters or emails.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, may, regarding, second, so, then, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77631578947 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42030165698 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.6831966182 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.125 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184246762093 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898805442926 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105829317125 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135917130343 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135031706997 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.