The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The given line graph illustrate the information regarding the proportion of enquiries in the form of in person, by letter/email and by telephone received by tourist information center over the six months period in 2011.
It can be clearly seen that, individual enquire are quite popular and tourist information office received the highest number of enquire through this mode of communication than the others three mentioned categories.
As a matter of fact, in January enquire by customer using telephone was 1500, by letter/email complain was about just under 800 whereas individual complain was just above 400. Similarly, the mode of telephone enquire decline by 500 in March and there was a gradual increased in the proportion of making enquire by using the same mode of communication up to 1600 at the end of June. On the other hand, popularity of using email and letter as a mode of enquire was gradually declined up to March and it had decreased by half at the end of the period. Individual enquire on the other hand showed an upward trend, overtaking that of letter/email in between February and March and that of telephone in the second half of march it had surged up to a peak at 1900 in June.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, second, similarly, so, whereas, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84057971014 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81205069588 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.8759563986 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 167.0 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167151792907 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988484683229 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142382059452 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185495284307 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159010450713 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.