The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to 3 different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the number of overseas tourists to 3 various regions in an unknown nation within Europe from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the quantity of tourists to all the 3 areas increased over the course of 20 years. It is also noticeable that the coast was the location attracting the most visitors.
In 1987, the coast had 40,000 tourists as the highest figure. The numbers of visitors to the mountains and lakes were half of and one fourth of that number respectively. During 1992 and 1997, the tourists to the coast and lakes rose steadily. The tourists to the mountains also experienced a slight rise, from around 25,000 to exactly 30,000 despite a fall in the middle of this period.
In 2002, there was a similar pattern in the number of tourists to the coast and mountains: both of them grew gradually. The visitors to the lakes peaked at about 75,000 in this year. In the final year, the number of coastal visitors stood at the top level, and that of the tourists to the lakes was about 25,000 fewer, standing at the second position. The number of the visitors to the mountainous areas was at the last level, at around 35,000 in spite of its steady growth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, as to, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62085308057 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40388565606 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507109004739 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8430993247 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112227424152 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473303180065 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442881834201 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759263146523 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445295042727 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.