The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 to 2004/05.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about how many people use the national rail network, London underground, and light rail & metro systems in Great Britain from 1950 to 2004/05.
Overall, both three railway systems had a noticeable increase in comparison with the beginning. At the end of the period, the national rail network was the most common.
In 1950, the national network was the most prevalent system with 1000 million travellers . It reached its peak in the mid of the 1950s (about 1100 million passengers) before dropping dramatically and hitting a low in the 1980s (about 600 million people). The London underground had almost stayed the same for over 30 years (approximately 700 million individuals) before reaching its bottom in the 1980s (500 million commuters).
In 2004/05, the national rail network remained most common with over 1000 million people, increasing by 400 million compared to 20 years ago. This was followed by the London underground with about 100 million fewer than the first one. Despite only starting in the 1960s, light rail & metro systems saw a considerable number with over 200 million travellers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lent system with 1000 million travellers . It reached its peak in the mid of the 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62841693851 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1778869777 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0872784028873 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397946987352 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490543827382 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687264143478 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560984259974 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.