The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the quantity of stores which closed and that of new stores which opened in one nation from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, the number of shops which both closed and opened decreased. It is also noticeable that the closures of shops hit the lowest point in 2015.
Regarding the closed stores, the beginning number was about 6,500 in 2011. That number then fell slightly to around 6,000 and rose to over 7,000 in the next two years. In 2014, the number dropped by about 500 before starting to hit the lowest point in 2015: below 1,000. During the next year, the number of the closed shops increased by 5 times then fell minimally and returned to the same number as in 2016 during the final year.
Concerning the newly opened stores, the starting point was so much higher than that for the closed ones: at approximately 8,500. However, the number declined by about 4,000 in the next year and grew to over 6,000 in 2014. The figure for 2015 was similar to that for 2012. Then during the next two years, it fluctuated between 4,000 and 4,100 before halting at precisely 3,000 in 2018.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61616161616 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.104164299 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1705519006 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238569326579 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981953878433 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697751677089 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161080326599 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544301312954 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61616161616 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.104164299 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1705519006 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238569326579 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981953878433 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697751677089 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161080326599 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544301312954 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.