The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The provided graph informs about the number of guests who visited the Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017. The units are measured as millions of visitors.
Overall, the total number of tourists coming to the island had climbed up over the years. Although the number of visitors staying on the island was high before 2015, most of the visitors, since 2016, chose to stay on the cruise ships.
In 2010 and 2011, a little over half a million travelers stayed on the island which increased dramatically to 1.5 million in 2013 and settled there for till 2015. Even though the number went down to less than that in 2016, it again reached to 1.5 million in 2017. On the other hand, around 0.5 millions of tourists stayed on the cruise ships from 2010 to 2013. However, since 2013, the number of tourists staying on the ships had sky-rocketed each years and reached 2 millions in 2017.
Only 1 million people had visited the Caribbean island in 2010 which had a steady increase of incoming guests and reached a 3.5 million tourists in 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...on in 2017. On the other hand, around 0.5 millions of tourists stayed on the cruise ships fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68852459016 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24336740272 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2150064543 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294186965892 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137041576658 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10836357386 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214688222545 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744487504618 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.