The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summarise the information by reporting and selecting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture given illustrates the data of tourists on an island in the Caribbean region staying on cruise ships, on an island, and in total in each year from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total number of visitors increased significantly, as well as two ways of staying while coming to the island.
As can be seen from the graph, in 2010, the data of tourists was a million people in sum, consisted of three-fourths visitors living on island and one-fourth of them opted to stay on cruise ships. In 2017, the number of visitors rose dramatically to 3,5 million in total, 2 million and 1,5 million choices for staying on boats and on land respectively.
During the years 2010 and 2017, the number of travelers had witnessed a fluctuation. For those who stay on land, there were no changes in the years 2010 and 2017 at 750 thousand people, and two years from the year 2013 at 1,5 million. While with the visitors staying on boats, the figure showed the fluctuation from 2010 to 2012, but onwards, the simulated line rose stably and reached the peak at 2 million in the end.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58854166667 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55702646283 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7005687944 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150361238856 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813870691436 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395426379998 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100386132781 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328065344213 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.