The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph provide the information about the tourist number visiting a Caribbean island in past 7 years ,from 2010 to 2017 and their preference of staying .

To begin with, visitors staying on cruise ships at 2010 was about 0.25 million which is 50% less then visitors staying on island. In 2011, it rose up to 0.5 million but goes down on 2012 at the same level of beginning. From 2013, it rose up continuously till 2017 and met the highest peak by approximately 2 million in 2017. From 2010 to 2015, though it rising continuously but it had always remained less than people visiting on island.

Second graph shows, the number of people staying on island with around 0.75 million in 2010, which had covered 75% of total. In 2011, it remains constant and rose till 2013 with around 1.5 million , which is also a highest level. After 2013, it remains constant for next 2 years and slightly decrease in 2016. In 2017, it rise again upto almost 1.5 million which is equall to 2013,2014 and 2015.

Furthermore, the last graph show the total number of visitors of Caribbean island. In 2010, total number of visitors was around 1 million, on which people staying on island had covered 75% and it slightly rose up till 2015 with approximately 2.75 million and remains constant for 1 year and again rose little higher and becomes almost 3.5 million in 2017. In 2017, visitors staying on cruise ships covered more than 50% of total.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
The graph provide the information about the tourist numbe...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iting a Caribbean island in past 7 years ,from 2010 to 2017 and their preference o...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... to 2017 and their preference of staying . To begin with, visitors staying on c...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...as about 0.25 million which is 50% less then visitors staying on island. In 2011, it...
^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d rose till 2013 with around 1.5 million , which is also a highest level. After 20...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...with around 1.5 million , which is also a highest level. After 2013, it remains c...
^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
... slightly decrease in 2016. In 2017, it rise again upto almost 1.5 million which is ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, second, so, then, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69721115538 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35575112069 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462151394422 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0165571931 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164513977732 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817551682861 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904714660534 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148675557376 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944931421594 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.45 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.