The diagram illustrates tourist figure of a specific Caribbean Island from 2010 to 2017 (in million).
It is noticeable that there were two types of tourism on the island known as staying on cruise ships and accommodating on island and both experienced an upward trend in the 7-year period.
In 2010, there were 250,000 visitor choosing cruise ships, and then this number went up to 500,000 in 2011 before decreasing to 200,000 in 2012. From 2012 to 2017, the figure had a gradual increase of from 250,000 up to 500,000 tourists each year and reached 2 million in 2017.
Starting at higher position, in 2010, visitors staying on island stood at 750,000, this statistics remained unchanged for the next year and then followed by a rise of 750,000 within 2 years from 2011 to 2013. This number of 1.5 million remained stable for following years till 2017 except for the year 2016 when it suffered a downturn and hit 1.25 million.
The total of 2 types of accommodations galloped in this timeline, it began at 1 million in the first year and significantly increased in the next 4 years and reached 2.5 million in 2014 before slowing down the pace in 2015 and 2016. From 2016 it again rose substantially to 3.5 million in 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...c Caribbean Island from 2010 to 2017 in million. It is noticeable that there were tw...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cruise'
Suggestion: to cruise
...10, there were 250,000 visitor choosing cruise ships, and then this number went up to ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ors staying on island stood at 750,000, this statistics remained unchanged for the n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7488372093 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57527453681 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8387878362 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995132003309 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603776056029 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544036872204 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765049246101 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620415705784 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.