The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line graph compares how many visitors coming to a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the total number of tourists experienced a significant jump over 7 years. It is clear that during the first period of 6 years, more comers stayed on the island than those staying on cruise ships, while the opposite trend was seen over the final 1 year.
In the year 2010, 1 million tourists visiting the Caribbean island with about 0.8 million people opting to stay on the island. One year later, this figure remained unchanged, whereas the number of people staying on the cruise ships increased by roughly 0.2 million. In the following 4 years, the figures for island and cruise ship visitors rose sharply to 1.5 million and around 0.3 million, respectively, raising the total number of tourists to approximately 2.8 million. However, the datum was stable for 1 year as the number of people staying on the island when travelling fell by about 0.2 million, while the figure for the other category showed the opposite tendency with the same difference in 2016.
By 2017, the total number of comers to the island had grown and finally reached its peak, at 3.5 million with 2 million visitors staying on cruise ships and 1.5 people staying on the island.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81018518519 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37733622732 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3552273386 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219474168792 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120035418222 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755710353203 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157020999565 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688866096187 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.