The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The line graph elucidates the precise information regarding various trends involved in visiting the place provided for the tourists in a Caribbean Island measured in million, over a span of 7 years from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, the line graph highlights the striking pattern among the visitors, it was noticed an upward trend for total visitors as well as the number of people who preferred to stay on cruise ships with slight fluctuations throughout the years. However, the number of individuals who agreed to enjoy the island, saw a moderate rise with little ebbs and flows.
In the beginning of the period, although the count of visitors who chose boats started with less than 0.25 million, it doubled by 2011 while the count who chose the island remained the same with 0.75 million. In the following years, these figures experienced a dramatic decline to its initial position, and witnessed an escalation in the rates with a peak of about 2 million visitors by 2017. In contrast, members who insisted the island climbed from 2011 to 2013 with 0.75 million rise, and reached a plateau of 1.5 million for the next two years, which then dropped during 2016 but settled with 1.5 million by the end of the time period.
Furthermore, the overall people who visited the island depicted a considerable rise from the first five years, and levelled off with 2.75 million for a year. Despite the changes, it rose to a record of 3.5 million by 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...rists in a Caribbean Island measured in million, over a span of 7 years from 2010 to 20...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r a span of 7 years from 2010 to 2017. Overall, the line graph highlights the s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erate rise with little ebbs and flows. In the beginning of the period, although...
^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ak of about 2 million visitors by 2017. In contrast, members who insisted the isla...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...million by the end of the time period. Furthermore, the overall people who visi...
^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose to a record of 3.5 million by 2017.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, regarding, then, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85483870968 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49185718637 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.809593712 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0949368006442 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520487394129 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510066711106 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793283895653 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605973445884 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.