The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The line chart gives information about how many people traveled to a Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017 in three categories.
Overall, the total number of tourists visiting the island experienced an increasing trend over a period of 8 years. It is worth noting that the figure of visitors staying on island was higher than that of those choosing to stay on cruise ships during most of the period.
In 2010, there were around 0.75 millions tourists staying on cruise ships while traveling the island, double the figure of those staying on cruise ships. After 1 year, while the number of people choosing to stay on ships had not changed, more visitors stayed on island, at around 0.5 million. Then, there was a rise in the quantity of people staying on ships by 0.75 million from 2011 to 2012. The figure stayed unchanged in the next two years before falling to 1.25 million visitors in 2016, then reverted in 2017. Meanwhile, the number of people staying on island rose steadily and reached a peak of 2 million in 2017.
The total number of tourists was about 1 million in 2010 and increased significantly by around 1.75 million visitors between 2010 and 2015. After 1 year, the figure had almost no change. Then, it hit a high of 3.5 million visitors in 2017.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73873873874 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34776313146 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6805969045 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6363636364 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140449027551 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066258996298 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051057640328 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107541921496 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316411398056 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.