The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to and from school in 1990 and 2010 using various modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the ways to commute to and from an educational institution by various transportation means for 5-12 years old pupils within 1990 and 2010.
It is obvious that although a majority of the young choose to attend school by bus rather than other means of transportation, they changed their mind to become car passengers in 2010.
In 1990, the number of car commuters was 4 million and that of bus was significantly higher with 12 million. However, the opposite was true in the next 20 years as the figure for car passengers was triple that in the first year, whereas the number of trips made by bus reduced by half in comparison to that in 1990.
Looking at the chart in more detail, for walking and cycling, their figures both stood at 6 million at the beginning of the period and dropped to around 2 – 3 million in 2010. Meanwhile, there was a slight decrease in the number of children both choosing to use bus and walk to school, from nearly 7 million to just above 5 million during the 20-year period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59139784946 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60732179661 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.3809150619 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139608737033 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728422553523 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377626654484 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832824383668 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277163374541 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.