The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to school in 1990 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given column graph illustrates the information about number of trips made by school children using different modes of transport during 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that during 1990, bus was most popular mode of transport among others. However, car was used most for travelling after two decades.
To begin with, during 1990, the only 4 millions of trips were made by car ;whereas the figure increased significantly and reached at 12 millions per year after two decades. It is interesting to note that equal number of trips were made by walking and cycling during 1990 by students to go to school which was around 6 millions. While just above 2 millions of people used walking during 2010, equivalent figure for cycling was only 2 millions.
Probing further, bus and walking was used for only 7 million and 6 million trips in 1990 and 2010 respectively, surprisingly, about 12 millions of trips made by bus during 1990. In contrast, the figure remained half in following 20 years. It can be seen that all modes of transport followed a decreasing trend except car .
Comments
The bar chart illustrates…
The bar chart illustrates how children aged 5-12 use various modes of transportation to travel to and from school in different years 1900 and 2010.
There has been a dramatic increase in transportation by car which almost tripled from 1990 to 2010 making it the most prefered transportation among children, whereas all other modes saw a decline in terms of number of trips in the same period. A sharp decline is witnessed in use of walking as a mode of transportation.
Travel through car has increased from around 4 million trips in 1990 to a little above 11 million trips in the following 20 years whereas there is a decline in walking which children used to travel around 12.5 million trips in 1990 to 6 million trips in 2010. In terms of percentage decrease cycling takes the first spot as this mode has dropped from 6 million to 2 million which is a 66.6% low from 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...transport among others. However, car was used most for travelling after two decad...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
... To begin with, during 1990, the only 4 millions of trips were made by car ;whereas the fig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ade by car ;whereas the figure increased significantly and reached at 12 millions...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... made by walking and cycling during 1990 by students to go to school which was ar...
^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...was around 6 millions. While just above 2 millions of people used walking during 2010, equiva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for only 7 million and 6 million trips in 1990 and 2010 respectively, surprisi...
^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on and 6 million trips in 1990 and 2010 respectively, surprisingly, about 12 mil...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '12 million'.
Suggestion: 12 million
...2010 respectively, surprisingly, about 12 millions of trips made by bus during 1990. In contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can be seen that all modes of transport followed a decreasing trend except car...
^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f transport followed a decreasing trend except car .
^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort followed a decreasing trend except car .
^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...followed a decreasing trend except car .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91304347826 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60311663515 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3607545383 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.444444444 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172694674505 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789459596205 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873056752991 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134181083524 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919643806366 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.