The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how many male and female university graduates pursued in Canada in the time period of 1992-2007.
Overall, the female graduates were high in number than the male graduates in the given time frame. Moreover, The graph of females fluctuated from 1992 to 1998 before it started to rise drastically. Similarly, Males graph was also undergone into fluctuation from 1992 to 2001 before started to escalate considerably.
Female graduates were just below one lakh in 1992 and had risen slightly to 104,000 in 1995. In contrast, females count was fallen to around one lakh in 1997 and remains stable till 1999. Consequently, From 1999 onwards, the graph of female graduates rose dramatically to 146,000 in 2007.
Male graduates were just above 70,000 in 1992 and begin to escalate to around 76,000 in 1995 before falling to about slightly over 70,000 in 1998. Subsequently, the males' graph undergoes again a slight rise and fall and then reaches around 72,000 in 2001 while from 2001, the males' graph started to increase considerably to around 95,000 in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: high
... Overall, the female graduates were high in number than the male graduates in the given ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, moreover, similarly, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62595909279 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.7523132731 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193830284945 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973521246625 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597200822885 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144654860932 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524460780127 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.