The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates the proportion of graduate students in universities in Canada between 1992 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that there was an increasing in the number of female and male graduates. In addition, the figure for women was always higher than that for men throughout the given period.
It can be seen from the chart that, at the beginning of the period, nearly 100,000 females graduating from the universities in Canada. then this figure rose marginally to 102,000 studnets before experiencing a slight decline by 2,000 graduates in 1995. The same pattern can be seen for the proportion of men. From 1995 to 2001, the number of female students who studied in Canadian universities witnessed an upward trend after falling to under 100,000 in 1998. Meanwhile, the figure for men fluctuated for a 6-year-period. In the remaning years, the quantities of female and male expericed the same trend, in which both figures for women and men grew dramatically to reach their peaks at below 150,000 and 70,000 at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt that, at the beginning of the period, nearly 100,000 females graduating from t...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...uating from the universities in Canada. then this figure rose marginally to 102,000 ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure rose marginally to 102,000 studnets before experiencing a slight decline by ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97740112994 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7362253276 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9358113614 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121427533299 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574426886548 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674937011828 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103131191481 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712050426454 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.