The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

The bar chart depicts the proportion of people who watched movies in separate days of weeks in a country of Europe over a period of three years ( 2003-2007).

Overall, the most popular day of a week was Saturday whereas the lest favorite day to watch movie was Monday. These was correlation between the begging of weekends and climbing up the number of viewers as opposed to felling percentages on weekdays.

Looking closely to weekend data, the percentage of people started to increase at the begging of weekend on Friday, which was exactly same for all three years( 30%), climbed to peak on Saturday which was between 40-45%. This figure again dipped a little between 30-34% on Sunday. In addition, 2005 is the year when most people went to the cinemas on weekends.

Coming to weekdays history, on Mondays people went for movies the least below 15% in compared to Thursday when the proportion fluctuated between 14-23%. Presence of Audience on Tuesday was under 20% as opposed to Wednesday, which showed a range of fluctuation (9-16%). As a whole, weekdays in the year of 2003 had the more audiences compare to other days.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y of Europe over a period of three years 2003-2007. Overall, the most popular ...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...favorite day to watch movie was Monday. These was correlation between the begging of ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86979166667 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48942533494 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2597441933 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969717395879 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393887710794 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261838325726 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595992386669 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0077473165629 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.