The proportion of people who used the bus for travelling for various purposes is conventionally illustrated by the given table between 2009 and 2011. the data has been calibrated in percentage.
To start with, in 2009, 65% of people went shopping by bus. This percentage dropped significantly and reached just over 50% by 2011. while , nearly a fifth used the passenger vehicle for visiting friends in 2009 and 2010, but these figures increased slightly in 2011 when just a quarter of people used the coach for this purpose.
Secondly, the voyage for work was done by 5% in 2009, whereas this proportion declined marginally and by 2011, hardly any person travelled by bus for going to work. Furthermore, using the bus for study and day tours showed a similar trend, but the use of the bus for day tours was done by about 3% more people in all the given years.
To sum up, it can be clearly seen that the bus was the most prefered mode for shopping in the given time period. Also, the use of buses for shopping and going to work became less, year by year. On the other hand, for other purposes, the choice of a bus is considerably increased over the three decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the given table between 2009 and 2011. the data has been calibrated in percentage....
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ata has been calibrated in percentage. To start with, in 2009, 65% of people we...
^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ntly and reached just over 50% by 2011. while , nearly a fifth used the passenger veh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...and reached just over 50% by 2011. while , nearly a fifth used the passenger vehic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61722488038 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48646677171 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574162679426 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3749936709 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149759832875 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680395296626 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534233864613 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107551621664 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469085999578 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.