The line graph gives information about the pollution levels by two pollutants(sulphur dioxide and smoke) in London city over a period of time, from 1600 to 2000. All units are measured in micrograms per cubic metre.
Overall, it can be seen that, there were almost zero micrograms of sulphur dioxide and smoke find in the beginning and end of the period in London city. However, during the period the amount of sulphur dioxide pollution was much higher than the smoke pollution.
When look at the details, in the early years of the 16th century the quantity of both pollutants were almost zero, however the amount of sulphur dioxide increased rapidly, while the amount of smoke saw a gradual increase. After a centuary, between 1700 to 1750, pollution due to sulpher dioxide reached almost 750 which was three times higher than the amount of smoke during the same period.
After three centuries, in the beginning of 19th century both sulphur dioxide and smoke reached its peak with almost 800 microgramms and 500 micrograms respectively. In this point, the difference between both reduced to 300 from 500, two century before. after this both figures gradually went down and reached almost zero level .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...dioxide and smoke in London city over a period of time, from 1600 to 2000. All units are measu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth pollutants were almost zero, however the amount of sulphur dioxide increased ...
^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost 800 microgramms and 500 micrograms respectively. In this point, the differe...
^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...tween both reduced to 300 from 500, two century before. after this both figures gradual...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ed to 300 from 500, two century before. after this both figures gradually went down a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... went down and reached almost zero level .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49436879714 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3999087284 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152556790536 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681454705753 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882019659707 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107675667786 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869061715715 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.