Given line graph illustrates the population growth of India and China from 2000, along with the proposed growth untill 2050. At first a glance it is clear that Indian population growth appeared to be more lenier compared to the counterparts.
In 2000 the indian population was 1000 billion whereas China stood at 1250 billion. The following years indian numbers jumped twice as much as the China's growth, as evidenced by 2010 population. In 2010 indian people were 1200 billion while that of China was 1350 billion, shows the gap reduced dramatically. In 2020, proposed indian community will be 1330 billion reaching further closer to China, as they can reach around 1420 approximately by this time.
However, the indian public could catch up Chinese by 2030 as suggested by the given figure and further grow thereafter. By 2030 the Chinese public will attain a platue, besides can exhibit a negative trend thereafter; on the otherhand, India can grow beyond China by 2040. Population figure of India will cross China around 100 billion in 2040 and make a huge gap by 2050, expected around 200 billion, more than China.
Overall, Indian population showed a steady growth and proposed to hold the same value, incontrast the Chinese can control the growth by 2030 considerably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally. In 2020, proposed indian community will be 1330 billion reaching further cl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07109004739 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54882908951 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582938388626 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7494827525 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234148411377 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104063133361 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763611254962 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157252287251 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599569037744 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.