The graph is a representation of the recycling rate of four different materials like paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans, and plastics, during the period 1982 to 2010 for a particular country.
The recycling rate for the most recycled item paper and cardboard has been between the range of 60% to 70% from 1982 - 2010 with some fluctuations. Initially, the percentage grew by 5% between 1982 - 1986, after which it again depleted by 5% in the period 1986 - 1990. Then it gradually increased and reached a peak with an 80% recycling rate in mid of 1990 - 1994, which later kept on descending until 2010 and reached 70% by then.
Initially, starting in 1982 at 50% recycling rate the glass containers saw a downfall to 40% until reaching 1990's, after which it took a steady increase and reached up to 60% by the year 2010. The Aluminium cans took the start only after 1982 at a slow pace, but it has taken a steep rise over the years and reached to more than 40% recycling rate by the year 2010.
Plastics have seen the lowest of the recycling trend, with its rate ranging between just 0-10% over the years. The recycling of plastics started only after 1986, but it is yet to pick up as compared to other materials in that particular country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66816143498 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54345684038 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.5845055203 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163157866159 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823117120446 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058669607076 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116767642778 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563824280568 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.