The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The given line chart presents information about amount of goods transported in different methods in the UK every four years between 1974 and 2002.
As an overall trend, the figures for the most transporting methods showed a significant upward trend despite fluctuation. Only rail method which was observed no change between the first year and the last year in typical period.
In 1994, the figures for road was over 65 million tonnes increasing gradually to roughly 80 million tonnes in 1990, before falling to lower 80 million tonnes. There was a rise to almost 100 million which was a much higher than in the other methods of transportation. Undergoing a similar upward trend, the quantity of water transportation increased to approximately 65 million tonnes during 1974 and 1982, before increasing slightly to 60 million tonnes in 1986 and remaining the same number 4 year later. There was a decline in 1998, decreasing to about 50%, followed by growing gradually to over 60 million tonnes in 2002.
In contrast, goods transported in the UK by rail witnessed fluctuation, some ups and downs, between 25 million tonnes and 40 million tonnes. While pipeline use climbed from roughly 10 million tonnes to about 20 million tonnes in 1994 and then it saw no change until the end of period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... saw no change until the end of period.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01388888889 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71351198464 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1569209618 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124919746638 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670595837336 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870425528316 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11544646311 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993355751076 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.