The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the number of products moved in the UK from 1974 to 2002 using various means of delivery, namely, road, water, rail, and pipeline. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, the amount of goods delivered showed an upward trend with some fluctuations in between the said periods. At the start, products transported is estimated at about 160 million tonnes. Over time, it has gradually increased and at the end of the period, it has reached a maximum of about 220 million tonnes.
With respect to the mode of transport, the majority of products are moved by means of road and has remained the most preferred method over the entire time. Water and rail shared the second spot at the start of the period, but, delivery through water progressively climbed up in time while rail went the opposite direction, gradually losing popularity but eventually peaked at the end of the period. Pipeline, however, remained the least favorite among the four but has gradually risen over the years and nearly quadrupled the amount it transported at the end of the period.
In summary, the number of goods transported in the UK has increased dramatically over the years with most products delivered via road. However, other modes of delivery such as water, rail, and pipeline are slowly gaining popularity over time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...il, and pipeline. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, the amount of goods...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, while, in summary, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03603603604 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57660807642 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1868404777 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12629701878 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547508325839 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418717000616 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083997681871 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125438281865 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.